Shiko Postimin Tek
Vjetėr 02-07-12, 22:37   #13
Arb
 
Avatari i Arb
 
Anėtarėsuar: 09-10-04
Vendndodhja: Little Dardania, NEW YORK
Postime: 11,439
Arb i pazėvėndėsueshėmArb i pazėvėndėsueshėmArb i pazėvėndėsueshėmArb i pazėvėndėsueshėmArb i pazėvėndėsueshėmArb i pazėvėndėsueshėmArb i pazėvėndėsueshėmArb i pazėvėndėsueshėmArb i pazėvėndėsueshėmArb i pazėvėndėsueshėmArb i pazėvėndėsueshėm
Gabim Re: Qemal Ataturku mbi Islamin!

Religion and the individual

Religion, particularly Islam, was between an individual and God in Atatürk's eyes.[28]. When compared to Ottoman practice (political Islam integrated to government life through Millets), Atatürk believed in a form of reformed Islam (Islam between an individual and God). He believed it was possible to blend native tradition (based on Islam) and Western modernism harmoniously.[29] In this equation, he gave more emphasis towards the modernization. His modernization aimed to transform social and mental structures (native traditions of Islam) to eradicate the irrational ideas, magical superstitions and so on.[29]

Atatürk was not against religion but what he perceived as all Ottoman religious and cultural elements that brought limits to people's self being.[29] He concentrated his reforms (regarding popular sovereignty) against obstacles for the individual choices being reflected in the social life. He viewed civil law and abolition of the caliphate as required for reflection of individual choices. He perceived religion as a matter of conscience, a problem of worship, but not politics. The best response on this issue comes from himself
“ "Religion is a matter of conscience. One is always free to act according to the will of one's conscience. We (as a nation) are respectful of religion. It is not our intention to curtail freedom of worship, but rather to ensure that matters of religion and those of the state do not become intertwined.[30]" ”

Atatürk believed in freedom of religion, but he was a secular thinker and his concept of freedom of religion was not limitless. He differentiated between social and personal practice of religion. He applied social considerations (secular requirements) when the public practice of religion was considered. He said that no one can force another to accept any religion or a sect (freedom of belief) [31]. Also, everyone has the right to perform or neglect, if he so wishes, obligations of any religion he chooses (freedom of worship), such as the right to not fast during Ramadan.[32]"
Arb Nuk ėshtė nė linjė   Pėrgjigju Me Kuotė